Legion Build Dbd 2020, Peter Kraus Aperture Net Worth, Jackie Schimmel Parents, Kit Cars Australia, Toyota Avalon Mods, Are Manx Cats Expensive, Victoria Jo Stinnett 2020, Essay Brainstorming Pdf, Kathryn Boyd Net Worth, Creepy Titanic Artifacts, Statue Escape Game Island Walkthrough, " />

voigtlander 65 vs sony 90

From what I ve read, I would be mostly concerned about (lack of) stabilization here. Voigtländer est l'une des plus anciennes sociétés dont l'activité a pour cadre la réalisation d'appareil optiques et photographiques. Spec-wise, major prons/cons are easily distinguished, even by a novice such as myself i.e: Sony 90mm G Macro: AF, OSS, internal focusing, Voigtlander 110mm APO Macro: tad sharper (but how much? Hello, I've got the 90mm Macro together with a sony A7. Would I be able to even get close to producing photos that match the level that I would otherwise achieve if I picked the 'easy' path (AF/Sony)? Because optical quality is at the very top as a criterion for choosing a lens. Often you are better off focusing on one aspect, such as a distant formation. Some little night sky/star photography at times, which I always found fascinating to explore (still trying to get a glimpse of the Northern Lights!) Another disadvantage for the Voightlander is in regard to shooting video with this lens. They are not corrected automatically by Lightroom and you will need to set correction to 2-3 (which is very little to suppress them). But for specifically macro purposes, AF is no advantage, and generally speaking, MF lenses have better MF than AF ones. in the hands of an expert), the Voigtlander is a click above the Sony. We looked at cameras with selfie-friendly screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, and selected the best. Thank you Niels. To me the image you claim has poor CA performance looking through leaves on tree into light, surely this is diffraction not CA. Or at least until I upgrade to a body that supports IBIS. When moving slowly, insects often stay at their position. Canon's EOS R5 is one of the best mirrorless cameras on the market today. Do you see my point? But if statistics are correct, then I m having less chances of picking a decent copy of the Sony (if I decided to go with the Sony). Also, have to ask - was stabilization off? As for the usefulness of AF in really close-up/macro scenarios, I guess that would come in hand especially for a beginner like myself, but others claim that AF isn't really an asset whilst shooting bugs. Look how sharp it is for a portrait in the border ! With this aperture you need a flash anyway to get enough light in your camera. Up until yesterday, I was almost certain that I m gonna go for the Sony G, having already eliminated Voigtlander's little brother (2/65 APO), as I wanted something that would at least achieve 1:1 magnification (as a proper macro lens should do in my opinion!). Or is it just the G90? Thanks for your great review, it looks like this lens will become a classic. I am reading that Sony lenses have among the largest fluctuation as far as copy quality is concerned. If you want totally manual focus and don't feel a need for stabilization then go for it. Le seul point d’amélioration est le manque de protection contre les intempéries et les poussières. That aside, both lenses were sharp shooting in visible light, but found the 110mm a much better option (can't justify it now, but it's on my wish list for next year). This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. In the case of 1:1 macro shooting, only thing that should matter is the sharpness achieved by either of those two lenses whilst 1:1 and at minimum focus distance. E.g. Have tested 10 lenses for the a6300, and the Voigtlander 110mm macro is THE WORST for infrared. Les objectifs Voigtländer pour appareil à télémètre existent en deux montures différentes: Leica M ou LTM (Leica Thread Mount ou 39 à vis). Shooting macro means inevitably spending time outside e.g. It's what you said (OSS + AF) versus slightly better optical + build quality. Regardless of that, many people seemed very positive about this lens (rolling reviews here and here ). I’m sorry to push this old thread up again, but I ‘m curious. From the smallest, there are 55 inches (55NANO90UNA vs XBR55X900H), 65 inches (65NANO90UNA vs XBR65X900H), and 75 inches 75NANO90UNA vs XBR75X900H).Meanwhile, their biggest screen is a bit difference where the NANO 90 comes in 86 inches (86NANO90UNA) while the Sony X900H comes in 85 inches (XBR85X900H). In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. I don't know how the prices or size/weight of the Voightlander compares with the Sony. Most shooting with "macro" lenses really isn't in the true macro range, but is closeup shooting at ranges just slightly closer than other lenses allow. Certains aiment d’autre non, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-1000 s à f – 2,0 à ISO 100-012-3, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-400 s à f – 3,2 à ISO 100-013, The color rendition is gorgeous  it has its own signature, like Zeiss have one, Le rendu des couleurs est superbe, l’objectif a une vrai signature tout comme les Zeiss, Bokeh and backround blur  is one of the “weak” point of the lens , is quite good but not thrilling like a G Master lens, At close distance it is quite nice but for longer distance the background is quite present and nervous, Le rendu du flou d’arrière plan et le bokeh sont une des “faiblesses” de l’objectif, il est assez bon mais loin d’un objectif G Master, A faible distance il est doux et agréable mais pour la photo de rue ou de paysage à plus longue distance , le fond peut se révéler assez dérangeant et présent, The macro performance is good but the max magnification at 1:2 limits its possibilities, Le rendu en macro est très bon mais le rapport de reproduction 1:2 limite ses possibilités, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₅₀ s à ƒ – 8,0 à ISO 320-298-2, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-160 s à f – 8,0 à ISO 400-039, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-160 s à f – 4,0 à ISO 500-021, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-160 s à f – 4,0 à ISO 1250-020, All photos are straight out of the camera with no sharpening or any adjustments, Tous les photos sont sans aucune retouches, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₅₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 320-312, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-2500 s à f – 2,0 à ISO 100-034. Also consider general use as a 90mm lens in non-closeup/macro situations. Sure OSS is not so effecive in macro range but you still gain 1-2 stops with OSS. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Ici on a du mal a savoir si l’on est au centre ou dans un coin ! ), but I can do some decent research. Now though, I m having a dilemma as to which I should pick - the Sony or the Voigtlander? They are sharp because the flash duration is very short, so flash duration becomes effective shutter speed. If you are using this as a close up (as opposed to macro) without flash or tripod than both auto focus and stabilization DO become important considerations. claims none. J’ai testé beaucoup d’objectifs mais presque tous montraient un performance significativement moins bonne dans les coins à pleine ouverture. So, it's a hard choice to make. I borrowed a friend's a5000 (which doesn't claim any weather proofing), but still didn't have any issues. Obviously I wouldn't go out in pouring rain even if both body and lens claimed to be water-tight, but there are cases some accidental water splash is unavoidable. In fact, the only lens I have consistently heard of issues that would warrant concern is the old Zeiss A-mount 16-50 that was popular in the early KM and Sony DSLR days. If I want to add any more capability, I add the tiny CV 21/3.5 at essentially no extra cost in weight/space. Sony Alpha Blog Sony Alpha tests & reviews (English & Français) About. In these situations AF and the extra stabilization are extremely useful. With multiple cameras to choose from, and options that include 8K and 6K video, can this drone give DJI a run for its money? I am talking wide open, and throughout the entire image (center, corners). P.S. Most shooting with "macro" lenses really isn't in the true macro range, but is closeup shooting at ranges just slightly closer than other lenses allow. Whether you’re just sharing clips with friends or you’re launching an online on-camera career, vlogging matters. a gasket)? Elles nécessiteront une correction manuelle en Lightroom (curseur sur 2-3), Un piqué exceptionnel sur tout le champ dès la pleine ouverture à F2, Un prix raisonnable compte tenu des performances (900 euros), Un bon bokeh en macro , moins bon à plus grande distance, un rapport d’agrandissement de seulement 1:2, Une bague de mise au point très précise en macro , moins en portrait ou photographie de rue. The aperture ring is at the front of the lens,  it is quite thin and sometimes you touch the focus ring and change the focus instead of changing the aperture ring. Tripod is also cumbersome especially when you start shooting macro. crop 100% : bokeh with some light onion rings / bokeh avec léger effet d’oignon, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-1600 s à f – 2,0 à ISO 100-033, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₅₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-602, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₄₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-609, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₃₂₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-543, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₅₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-589, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₁₂₅₀ s à ƒ – 4,0 à ISO 100-554, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₃₂₀ s à ƒ – 8,0 à ISO 100-550, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₅₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-561, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₅₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-555, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-601, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-601-3, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₂₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-601-2, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – ¹⁄₈₀₀₀ s à ƒ – 2,0 à ISO 100-540, Voigtlander MACRO APO-LANTHAR 65mm F2 Aspherical at 65 mm – 1-160 s à f – 2,0 à ISO 1000-027. Then you can have 1/20 sec or more shutterspeed to prevent black background. It is the very close range where autofocus doesn't matter and steadiness isn't an issue ONLY when using flash or a tripod. That didn’t bother you? In these situations AF and the extra stabilization are extremely useful. I also find the 65mm works well for single row panos (ie camera oriented vertically). If you are really torn, rent first. I m still try to weight those pros/cons for each, see where my priorities are.

Legion Build Dbd 2020, Peter Kraus Aperture Net Worth, Jackie Schimmel Parents, Kit Cars Australia, Toyota Avalon Mods, Are Manx Cats Expensive, Victoria Jo Stinnett 2020, Essay Brainstorming Pdf, Kathryn Boyd Net Worth, Creepy Titanic Artifacts, Statue Escape Game Island Walkthrough,

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get the latest RightsTech news and analysis delivered directly in your inbox every week
We respect your privacy.